Monday, December 26, 2005

The Christmas Goat

Gabe and I hiked up the hill behind our house today. While walking, we happened upon a flock (?) of goats. A little baby goat with cute, pointy ears was trusting enough to let me pick it up. I was pretty excited about that.

Gabe's got pictures of the Goat and I here. We all hope you had a scampering good Christmas! My friend and I sure did.

Sincerely,
John

Saturday, December 24, 2005

Mercy and Truth

Riffs on evangelism

All good Christian evangelism, it would seem to me, is built upon the premise that the truth-claims of Christianity--about God, about sin, about the necessity of Christ's death and resurrection--are not only true, but also obvious. The Bible never stoops to mount an apologetic for God's existence; it is assumed. Paul's letter to the Romans begins with an incredibly brief summary of pagan religious history, in which he more or less assumes that while man was worshiping stars, idols and brute beasts, he was fully aware of what he was doing. Man did not claw his way upward, weaning himself on weak nature religions on the path toward monotheism; he staggered downward at an alarming rate, cast out of Eden but willing in his pride to worship lower beings rather than the God who made him. As a result, God judged the wickedness of man, and his foolish heart was darkened.

This is an important thing to understand about the Bible--and about man, because it changes the nature of how we approach man in our task of evangelism. If man's problem is not only ignorance of the fact that he is loved by God, but also a willful suppression of the truth in unrighteousness (as Scripture so boldly and clearly states); then the solution to man's problem is not to tell him he is loved (he is already prone to believe that), but rather to clear away all the lies he is telling himself about God in order to avoid serving Him. I think this collides head-on with our traditional evangelical approach to evangelism, which has been to tell man that God loves him and has a wonderful plan for his life. Of course, it is true enough that God loves him, but if the fundamental problem we are dealing with is rebellion, mightn't we do better to follow the example of Peter, whose first sermon included these bold statements: "God has made this Jesus, whom you crucified, both Lord and Christ" -- "Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins" -- "Save yourselves from this corrupt generation"?

If we began to preach the Gospel as it really is (salvation from God's wrath as well as God's ultimate act of kindness and love for man) to men as they really are (rebellious as well as beaten down by their ignorance of God's mercy), is it possible that we would see evangelistic results closer to that of the early church? After all, Peter's politically incorrect first sermon in Acts 2, left his listeners "cut to the quick," asking, "What must we do to be saved?"

In my opinion, the problem with most modern-day evangelism is that it does not produce in men the desperation needed to ask this question. Telling man that God loves him is true enough, but the whole truth as Scripture gives it is a bit less palatable: God is going to judge man for his wickedness, and Jesus' blood is the last line of defense between man and God's righteous judgment. Any gospel that does not instill in man this fear and trembling before God, humbling him into a profound appreciation of God's grace, is no gospel at all.

I believe that evangelicals and fundamentalists alike have missed the boat on this issue. Evangelicals are too busy assuaging man with the assurance that God loves him to remind him that God will also judge him if he will not repent; fundamentalists have spent their efforts on frightening man with the prospect of hell, forgetting that unrepentant man does not realize that he deserves hell. It is easy enough to inculcate in man a fear of hell (the fundamentalists and even the Muslims have proven that); it is not nearly as easy to lead him into the fear of God.

If this is true--and it is--then our evangelistic situation is dire, because "The friendship of the Lord is for those who fear him" (Ps. 25:14). We who come in the Lord's name might do better to present the Cross as an act of justice as well as mercy, an idea of God's hatred for sin as well as of His love for man, and a standard against which sinful man will be eternally judged if he will not repent and be forgiven.

Thursday, December 22, 2005

Now I Know Why

I know what it is. I know why I'm not a good blogger. I'm never. Ever. Satisfied. I write the bare bones of an article, story, or essay, get disgusted at my own writing, attempt in vain to hammer it out into something more legible, eventually give up, save it as a draft, and quit my browser in dejection.

My father once told me that my main problem is that I never see anything through to completion. It was true then (I'd given up on reconnecting my grandparents' VCR to their home-theater system), and for the most part, it's still true now. I'm all perfectionism and no persistence. I guess I should probably be more diligent in what I set my hand to doing, and more gracious toward the final product when it's done.